Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53291

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : LC38 - LC41 Full Version

Association between Admission Blood Glucose Levels and Clinical Outcomes among Diabetic Adults Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Chennai, India: A Retrospective Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61603.18241
Dineshkumar Saravanan, Seethalakshmi Avudaiappan

1. Patient Safety Nurse, Department of Nursing, Dr. Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Nursing Foundation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Seethalakshmi Avudaiappan,
Professor and Head, Department of Nursing Foundation, Faculty of Nursing, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: seethalakshmi.a@sriramachandra.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Admission blood glucose levels have an impact on hospitalisation and Length Of Stay (LOS). Uncontrolled blood glucose levels have been found to affect patients’ outcomes. Elevation of the initial blood glucose level during critical diagnosis was identified as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in critical cases.

Aim: To examine the association between admission blood glucose levels and clinical outcomes in adult diabetic patients.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Data were collected between July 1, 2021, and August 31, 2021, using non-probability convenience sampling from 522 records of adult diabetic patients admitted between January 2019 and March 2020. Capillary random blood glucose levels at the time of admission and their effects on LOS, both in the hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU), readmission, and mortality data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test.

Results: Analysis of the records of 522 adult diabetic patients revealed that the mean and standard deviation (SD) of admission Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) level were 177.46±49.42 mg/dL, and the mean LOS in the hospital was 4.54±3.89 days. It was found that 340 (65.1%) patients had an admission duration of ≤4 days. There was a statistically significant association between admission blood glucose levels and LOS in the hospital (p-value=0.01), LOS in the ICU (p-value=0.008), readmission to the hospital (p-value=0.001), and mortality rate (p-value=0.0001).

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that admission blood glucose levels are associated with the clinical outcomes of patients. These findings substantiate the need for maintaining normal glycemic levels through patient education and a proactive team approach to improve patient outcomes.

Keywords

Length of stay, Mortality, Readmission

Hospitalisation and its outcomes are affected by the pre-existing health status of the individual, as well as their current complaints. Comorbidities such as diabetes, its acute and long-term complications, and the associated fluctuations in blood glucose levels, along with the stressors of the current condition and treatment factors, affect clinical outcomes (1). The number of people living with diabetes is gradually increasing. The cumulative incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Kerala was 21.9%, and the incidence of prediabetes was 36.7%. Nearly 60% of participants who had impaired plasma glucose at baseline converted to T2DM after 10 years (2). Increased glucose variability among non-diabetic patients was found to be associated with an increased risk of death. A targeted blood glucose range of 70-140 mg/dL was strongly associated with survival in critically ill patients without diabetes (3).

The risk of mortality was found to be higher in diabetic patients admitted with Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) as blood glucose levels affect the immunity of individuals. The median length of stay (LOS) in the hospital was six days. Patients with hypo- or hyperglycemia had higher 30-day mortality rates than patients with normoglycemia (4). The probability of mortality among diabetic patients with hyperglycemia was higher than those with normoglycemia. Hyperglycemia was associated with requirements for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and mortality (5). There was a significant difference in the median LOS for patients with <6.5 mmol/L on admission (4 days) compared to >6.5 mmol/L (six days). Hyperglycemia was associated with increased 28-day mortality and readmissions (6).

The association between hospitalisation for heart failure and type of diabetes among diabetic patients >30 years showed that a longer duration of diabetes mellitus and higher concentrations of Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) also predicted heart failure risk. The incidence of heart failure hospitalisation was two-fold higher in people with diabetes mellitus, with a higher case fatality in those with type 1 DM (7). A retrospective analysis of glucose variability and its effect on readmission rates revealed that patients who had readmission within 30 days after discharge had higher standard deviation of blood glucose levels than the control group. The study group also had higher HbA1c and LOS. Severe dysglycemia accounted for 24% of 30-day readmission. Blood glucose control targeted at HbA1c may affect postoperative outcomes and readmissions (8).

The above studies reveal that increased blood sugar levels, regardless of whether it’s type 1 or type 2 diabetes, are associated with patient outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, the need for intensive care, and readmissions. Medical records provide valuable insights into the management and outcomes of patients. With this view, the present study was undertaken among all patients with medical and surgical conditions with the objective of identifying the association between admission blood glucose levels and clinical outcomes such as LOS in the hospital, LOS in ICU, mortality, and readmissions among diabetic adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Material and Methods

A retrospective design was used to collect data from the records of 522 adult diabetic patients admitted for the management of various complaints (respiratory, cardiac, neurological, metabolic, uncontrolled DM, sepsis, gastrointestinal complaints, electrolyte abnormalities, fever, anemia, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, nephrological and urological) between January 2019 and March 2020 at Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The data collection period was from July 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) for Students, the Medical Superintendent and Medical Director of Sri Ramachandra Hospital and Medical Centre (SRMC), and the Head of the Department of Medical Records (SRMC) (IEC CSP/21/MAR/92/303).

Inclusion criteria: The study included the records of all patients diagnosed with diabetes and admitted for diagnostic, therapeutic, and invasive procedures, as well as follow-up of existing conditions. Patients admitted before the first wave of COVID-19 in the district were also included.

Exclusion criteria: The records of non diabetic patients were excluded from the study.

The instrument consisted of two sections. The first section collected demographic information such as age, gender, and place of residence, while the second section focused on clinical variables including Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG), Hemoglobin, Total WBC Count (TC), and the use of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHA) and insulin, obtained from the admission records. Outcome variables such as Length of Stay (LOS) in the hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU), as well as readmission rates and mortality, were obtained from the medical records. Normal fasting blood glucose levels are considered to be 70-110 mg/dL. Random blood glucose levels of 200 mg/dL indicate diabetes, while levels above 200 mg/dL are associated with acute hyperglycemia. The admission blood glucose levels were categorised into four groups: Group-1: <110 mg/dL, Group-2: 111-200 mg/dL, Group-3: 201-300 mg/dL, and Group-4: ≥301 mg/dL. These levels were based on a previous study by Park BS (9).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was entered into Microsoft Excel 2007 and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for variables such as age, Length of Stay (LOS) in the hospital and ICU. Chi-square test was used to determine the association between admission blood glucose and LOS in the hospital, mortality, and readmission. The F statistic was used to determine the association between admission blood glucose and LOS in the ICU. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The present study revealed that out of 522 adult diabetic patients, 252 (48.3%) were between 41-60 years of age, 291 (55.7%) were male, and 231 (44.3%) were female. A total of 299 (57.3%) resided in urban areas, and 499 (95.5%) of the patients were on Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHA). It was found that 381 (73%) of the patients had admission blood glucose levels between 111-200 mg/dL, as shown in (Table/Fig 1). The mean age of the patients with diabetes was 59.7±11.39 years, and the mean Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) level was 177.46±49.42 mg/dL. The mean Length of Stay (LOS) in the hospital was 4.54±3.89 days, and this was used as the cutoff value. Those ≤4 days and ≥5 days were considered below and above the normal range for the selected samples.

(Table/Fig 2) displays the frequency and percentage distribution of participants according to their outcome variables. It was found that LOS in the hospital was ≤4 days for 340 (65.1%) participants and ≥5 days for 182 (34.9%) participants. A total of 477 (91.4%) participants did not require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission.

The mortality rate was 11 (2.1%), and the readmission rate was 12 (2.3%) for diabetic patients.

Statistically significant associations were found between admission blood glucose levels and LOS in the hospital (p-value=0.01), mortality (p-value=0.0001), and readmission to the hospital (p-value=0.001), as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Additionally, a statistically significant association was found between admission blood glucose levels and LOS in the ICU (p-value=0.008), as shown in (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The prevalence of diabetes in India has been steadily increasing, reaching 8.9% in 2019. This has resulted in a significant economic burden due to healthcare expenditures, regardless of the socio-economic status of individuals (10). Non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, have contributed to an increased burden of years lived with disease (11). Diabetes remains one of the top ten causes of burden, contributing to Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) between 1990 and 2019, with an age-standardised DALY rate increase of 24.4% (18.5-29.7). India has a high prevalence of diabetes, with 74.2 million people (20-79 years) affected, ranking among the top five South East Asian regions in terms of prevalence.

The age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes for individuals aged 20-79 years is 9.6%, and the total healthcare expenditure due to diabetes is estimated to be 10 billion USD (12).

The aim of the present study was to examine the association between admission blood glucose levels and clinical outcomes among adult diabetic patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, South India. The sample included the records of 522 patients with diabetes. The study findings, as shown in (Table/Fig 1), revealed that 381 (73%) patients had admission blood glucose levels ranging from 111-200 mg/dL. The mean age of the patients was 59.7±11.39 years, and Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHA) were the primary line of treatment for the majority of adult diabetic patients. Out of the sample, 65 (12.5%) were admitted for uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. The patients had various comorbidities including respiratory, cardiac, nephrological, urological, and neurological problems. These findings were consistent with a study on diabetes mellitus and health status outcomes after Myocardial Infarction, where the median age was 49 years and the median initial blood glucose level was 169.50 mg/dL.

The common diagnostic categories and reasons for admission in that study were respiratory, renal, cardiac, stroke, and sepsis (13).

This study also found that the mean Length of Stay (LOS) in the hospital was 4.54±3.89 days, and there was a significant association between admission blood glucose levels and LOS in the hospital, LOS in the ICU, and readmissions. These findings are consistent with a study conducted by Regassa LD and Tola A at Government Hospitals of Harar, Eastern Ethiopia (14). In that study, an analysis of 135 samples revealed that 71 (52.2%) had a readmission rate that increased with the duration of the disease, female gender, inactive lifestyle, BMI greater than 29.9 kg/m2, and higher fasting blood glucose levels. Another study analysing the blood glucose levels within 24 hours of admission to the ICU among 14,000 patients found that an average blood glucose level of 110-140 mg/dL was associated with a better prognosis (15). An increase in glycaemic variability was associated with longer LOS and increased mortality in non-critically ill patients (16). Factors such as a diverse population with comorbidities, changes in homeostasis due to glucose metabolism or associated hormones, hypo or hyperglycemia, and the methods of measurement and their impact on ICU outcomes should be considered when assessing blood glucose levels in critically ill patients (17).

The present study, as shown in (Table/Fig 3), demonstrated that admission blood glucose levels of 201-300 mg/dL and >300 mg/dL were significantly associated with mortality (p-value=0.0001). This finding aligns with a study that identified controlled glucose status as being associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, reduced 30-day mortality, and improved 1-year mortality. Additionally, achieving glucose control was independently associated with a significant decrease in 1-year mortality. The researchers also recommended efforts to maintain glucose levels within reference ranges in critically ill patients to reduce mortality (18). Elevation of the initial blood glucose level in critical diagnoses was identified as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in critical cases. Elevation of blood glucose levels predicted worse outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (19). Admission random blood glucose levels of ≥180 mg/dL were found to be associated with low serum sodium levels, low serum bicarbonate levels, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores <8, increased length of hospital stay, and poor outcomes (20).

The mortality rate was found to be higher among patients with a previous diagnosis of diabetes and those with recent hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia and stress hyperglycemia have a significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (21). These findings highlight the importance of managing blood glucose levels in clinical settings to improve patient outcomes.

Further studies could be conducted to examine the effects of admission blood glucose levels on surgical outcomes, explore individual differences among diabetic adults and their impact on clinical outcomes, investigate the effects of self-management education on blood glucose levels at admission and discharge, and compare the effects of admission blood glucose levels on clinical outcomes between diabetic patients, newly diagnosed diabetic patients, and non-diabetic adults.

Limitation(s)

This study had a few limitations. Firstly, data on HbA1c, Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), and Post Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) were not available for all patients at admission and discharge, so this data was not included in the analysis. Secondly, the study originally planned to include records of patients from the Emergency Room (ER), but separate data for ER patients were not available. Therefore, the author included all adult diabetic patients admitted to the hospital in the study sample.

Conclusion

The present study showed that the mean CBG levels of adult diabetic patients were found to be 177.46±49.42 mg/dL. Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) were the predominant treatment regimen. There was a significant association between patients’ admission blood glucose levels and their clinical outcomes, such as length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, mortality, readmission, and days spent in the ICU. This study identifies the need to improve patient education and enable a proactive team approach in clinical settings. Nurses need to understand the impact of admission blood glucose levels in diabetic patients to facilitate a treatment plan that can reduce LOS and promote early recovery for patients with diabetes.

References

1.
Atlas IDFD. International Diabetes Federation. The Lancet. 1955;266:134-37 p. [crossref]
2.
Vijayakumar G, Manghat S, Vijayakumar R, Simon L, Scaria LM, Vijayakumar A, et al. Incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes in Kerala, India: Results from a 10-year prospective cohort. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):01010. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Krinsley JS, Preiser JC. Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dL >80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non diabetic critically ill adults. Crit Care [Internet]. 2015;19(1):01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Postma DF, van Werkhoven CH, Troeman DPR, Sankatsing SUC, Oosterheert JJ, Bonten MJM. Do admission glucose levels aid in predicting mortality associated with community-acquired pneumonia? Eur Respir J. 2017;50(4):1700307. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Carrasco-Sánches FJ, Lópes-Carmona MD, Martínes-Marcos FJ, Péres- Belmonte LM, Hidalgo-Jiménes A, Buonaiuto V, et al. Admission hyperglycaemia as a predictor of mortality in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 regardless of diabetes status: Data from the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. Ann Med. 2021;53(1):103-16. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Evans NR, Dhatariya KK. Assessing the relationship between admission glucose levels, subsequent length of hospital stay, readmission and mortality. Clin Med J R Coll Physicians London. 2012;12(2):137-39. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
McAllister DA, Read SH, Kerssens J, Livingstone S, McGurnaghan S, Jhund P, et al. Incidence of hospitalisation for heart failure and case-fatality among 3.25 million people with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2018;138(24):2774-86. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Hsieh CJ. High glucose variability increases 30-day readmission rates in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalised in department of surgery. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2019;9(1):01-07. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50751-7. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Park BS, Yoon JS, Moon JS, Won KC, Lee HW. Predicting mortality of critically ill patients by blood glucose levels. Diabetes Metab J. 2013;37(5):385-90. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Balasopoulou A, Kokkinos P, Pagoulatos D, Plotas P, Makri OE, Georgakopoulos CD, et al. Symposium recent advances and challenges in the management of retinoblastoma globe saving treatments. BMC Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2017;17(1):51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331284%0Ahttp://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC5354527%5Cnhttp:// bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-244X-11-49%5Cnhttp:// bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12886.
11.
Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Abdollahi M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
International diabetes federation, IDF. Diabetes in South-East Asia- 2021 Diabetes in South-East Asia-2021. Int Diabetes Fed [Internet]. 2021;10:07-08. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/.
13.
Ding Q, Funk M, Spats ES, Whittemore R, Lin H, Lipska KJ, et al. Association of diabetes mellitus with health status outcomes in young women and men after acute myocardial infarction: Results from the virgo study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(17):e010988. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Regassa LD, Tola A. Magnitude and predictors of hospital admission, readmission, and length of stay among patients with type 2 diabetes at public hospitals of Eastern Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):01-13. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Li L, Chen Q, Chen Q, Wu R, Wang S, Yao C. Association between blood glucose within 24 hours after intensive care unit admission and prognosis: A retrospective cohort study. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther. 2020;13:1305-15. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Mendes CE, Mok KT, Ata A, Tanenberg RJ, Calles-Escandon J, Umpierres GE. Increased glycaemic variability is independently associated with length of stay andmortality in noncritically ill hospitalised patients. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):4091-97. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Smith FG, Sheehy AM, Vincent JL, Coursin DB. Critical illness-induced dysglycaemia: Diabetes and beyond. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):04-06. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Sharif K, Ghadir S, Jakubowics D, Amital H, Bragassi NL, Watad A, et al. Improved outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus with good glycaemic control in the cardiac intensive care unit: A retrospective study. Cardiovasc Diabetol [Internet]. 2019;18(1):01-09. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0810-8. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Wu J, Huang J, Shu G, Wang Q, Lv Q, Huang Y, et al. Elevation of blood glucose level predicts worse outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Subramanian K, Radha D, Narayanan N, Natarajaboopathi R, Reddy KS, Shanagonda D, et al. Admission blood glucose level as a predictor of outcome in intensive care patients: A cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32801. [crossref]
21.
Cakir M, Altunbas H, Karayalcin U, Umpierres GE, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycaemia: An independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(3):1402.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61603.18241

Date of Submission: Nov 18, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 30, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 09, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 06, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 27, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 10

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com